SILVER SPRING — Using Saturday’s University of Maryland Terrapins football game as a metaphor, county executives Rushern Baker III, Ike Leggett and Ken Ulman on Thursday framed the referendum on expanding gambling in Maryland as a conflict between economic development and out-of-state interests.
“Just like I want Maryland to beat West Virginia on Saturday in football, I want Maryland to beat back this out-of-state money in November,” Howard County Executive Ken Ulman said.
If passed, the referendum, which appears as Question 7 on the ballot, would allow a casino to open at National Harbor in Prince George’s County — the sixth casino in the state. It would also enable existing casinos to stay open around the clock and offer table games like blackjack and roulette instead of just digital representations.
Ulman stressed the initiative’s impact on local education budgets as a reason why Maryland voters should cast ballots in favor of gambling expansion in November.
“We know that there is a burden to continue to be able to find the revenues to invest in our children’s education,” Ulman said. “This is one way to enhance the Education Trust Fund and help us accomplish that goal. It’s not the only way; it’s one way.”
As the bill was being debated in the General Assembly, Republicans accused Gov. Martin O’Malley of giving tax breaks to gambling companies, while raising taxes on Marylanders making more than $100,000. In Prince George’s County, some religious leaders worry that a casino could bring increased crime to their neighborhoods.
Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker III accused competing casinos in neighboring states of trying to distort the debate by running political ads opposing the expansion in Maryland.
“Make no mistake: This is about Maryland versus West Virginia,” Baker said. “People running ads against having a sixth site in Prince George’s County and expanding table games are from West Virginia.”
Baker also distanced himself from the idea that existing casinos in Maryland are opposing the expansion to protect their own bottom lines.
“We took care of Anne Arundel County — made sure they’re held harmless — and other facilities. I think people are satisfied with the way the bill came out of the General Assembly,” Baker said. “People in Maryland need to understand this is about protecting resources and dollars in the state.”